Clinical trial shows that giving smokers free e-cigarettes creates more dual users than switchers or quitters

1 February 2024

By Reiner Hanewinkel, Stanton A. Glantz, The Lancet

Carpenter et al. reported a naturalistic randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of giving smokers free e-cigarettes on stopping cigarettes six month later.

Significantly more smokers randomized to e-cigarettes stopped smoking (17% = 9% switchers +8% quitters) than in the control group (stopped smoking: 9% = 3% switchers +6% quitters), but there was no significant difference in having quit completely (e-cigarette: 8%; control: 6%) (Table 1). Significantly more smokers randomized to e-cigarettes (45%) became dual users than in the control group (11%).
Table 1Product use six months after randomization.
Source: Carpenter et al.
Supplemental Material 6a and 6b.
  Free e-cigarettes N = 427 Control no intervention N = 211 P
N (%) N (%)
Switchers (e-cigarette only) 39 (9%) 7 (3%) 0.008
Quitters (neither cigarette nor e-cigarette use) 34 (8%) 13 (6%) 0.52
Stopped cigarettes (switchers plus quitters) 73 (17%) 20 (9%) 0.012
Dual use (cigarette and e-cigarette use) 194 (45%) 23 (11%) <0.0001
Cigarette only 160 (37%) 168 (80%) <0.0001
a P values from Fisher’s exact tests.
For every 1 person given e-cigarettes who stopped smoking cigarettes (switchers plus quitters) 2.7 became dual users (vs. 1.2 in the control group). This difference is bigger for quitters (stopped cigarettes and stopped e-cigs): 5.7 dual users vs. 1.8 in the control group.
Providing free e-cigarettes to smokers was followed by an absolute increase in dual use relative to control of 34 percentage points (ppt) which was larger than the 8 ppt increase in stopping cigarettes and the 2 ppt increase in quitting vs. control.
Carpenter dismissed the increased dual use on the grounds that one-third reduced cigarette consumption by more than 50%, even though a 50% reduction does not have significant mortality benefits.
E-cigarette aerosol and cigarette smoke have different toxic profiles, making it likely that dual use is worse than smoking.
Following Carpenter et al., future studies of the association between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking should report complete results, separating switchers and quitters and dual users. Continued e-cigarette use and dual use should be reported as adverse events.
 
Contributors
RH and SAG contributed equally.
 
Declaration of interests
RH is deputy chair of the German smokefree alliance (unpaid). In the last three years SAG received royalties from McGraw Hill and University of California Press, consulting fees from World Health Organization, American Institutes of Research, George Washington University, and the University of North Carolina, and lecture honoraria from Montgomery Wellness Coalition, Hawaii Public Health Foundation, Thai Health Promotion, Japan Society for Tobacco Control. UCSF supported attending meetings/travel.
 
References
  1. 1.
    • Carpenter M.J.
    • Wahlquist A.E.
    • Dahne J.
    • et al.
    Effect of unguided e-cigarette provision on uptake, use, and smoking cessation among adults who smoke in the USA: a naturalistic, randomised, controlled clinical trial.
    eClinicalMedicine. 2023; 63102142
  2. 2.
    • Glantz S.A.
    New well-done RCT shows that giving smokers free e-cigarettes creates more dual users than switchers or quitters.
    (Assessed 2023/12/21)
  3. 3.
    • Chang J.T.
    • Anic G.M.
    • Rostron B.L.
    • Tanwar M.
    • Chang C.M.
    Cigarette smoking reduction and Health risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nicotine Tob Res. 2021; 23: 635-642
  4. 4.
    • Pisinger C.
    • Rasmussen S.K.B.
    The Health effects of real-world dual use of electronic and conventional cigarettes versus the health effects of exclusive smoking of conventional cigarettes: a systematic review.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 1913687

Linked Articles

SEATCA In Touch

Sign up to receive our monthly newsletter for the latest news and updates on our work in the ASEAN region and beyond.